Pinoy PlayStation

....waaaa!!! bibili nako talaga ng 3DS amf, di ko pa nalalaro to!!!! :wah: :partyhat: Parang ps3 graphics na ng tales of grace f.

Tales of the Abyss

Publisher: Bandai Namco
Platform: Nintendo 3DS
Genre: RPG
Origin: Japan, North America, Europe
Release: 2011



Bandai Namco will bring the classic PS2 RPG Tales of the Abyss to 3DS, the game will be available sometimes in 2011.

holy sh*t..... :whoa: :whoa:

PLAYABLE ASCHE sana

I'm already planning on getting 3DS once the next Pokemon game comes out but this is even better.. I guess there's really no need for me to replay ToTA on PS2 or even repair my DS lite's broken hinge..

...ako din, di ko na papagawa yung akin. Naging 2 gameboy advance yung DS lite ko e.

Parang Eternal Sonata yung graphics ah. Sana malocalize...

Seraph011 wrote:Parang Eternal Sonata yung graphics ah. Sana malocalize...

may possibility sir na malocalize kasi yung sa ps2 may NA version.

lol, pare pareho pala tayo. matagal nang sira yung hinge ng DSlite ko.
(nabagsak ng kapatid T_T)
i was actually going to have it fixed, pero 1k+ yung quote sa vmall,
then nag start lumabas rumors ng 3ds.

.

mkmcarlos wrote:

Seraph011 wrote:Parang Eternal Sonata yung graphics ah. Sana malocalize...

may possibility sir na malocalize kasi yung sa ps2 may NA version.

Buti naman! Sayang kasi madaming magagandang Tales series na hindi pa nalocalize eh.

Tales of Symphonia may US version sa GC, pero hindi lumabas yung PS2 version nun. Just sayin'.

you can get symphonia's sequel for the wii though. (the old cast is there too)
also, i still managed to get my GC disc of the original tales of symphonia from dblitz.


.

Sequel != Port

A remake can be a port but cannot be a sequel.

Just sayin'.

no.
you're mistaken.

Tales of Symphonia: Dawn of the New World is a DIFFERENT game.
it is NOT a remake.
it happers AFTER the events of the GC game, the main protagonist
is different, but lloyd and the others are still there.

'just saying.

Amusing how a comment about the possibilities of a localized Tales of the Abyss for the 3DS would suddenly become "popcorn fuel." Let's backtrack a bit.

This is the initial post:

Khrysler Jerikho wrote:Tales of Symphonia may US version sa GC, pero hindi lumabas yung PS2 version nun. Just sayin'.

You replied:

seven11 wrote:you can get symphonia's sequel for the wii though. (the old cast is there too)
also, i still managed to get my GC disc of the original tales of symphonia from dblitz.

In which I said;

Khrysler Jerikho wrote:Sequel != Port

A remake can be a port but cannot be a sequel.

Just sayin'.

Again, you replied:

seven11 wrote:no.
you're mistaken.

Tales of Symphonia: Dawn of the New World is a DIFFERENT game.
it is NOT a remake.
it happers AFTER the events of the GC game, the main protagonist
is different, but lloyd and the others are still there.

'just saying.

Makes me wonder then. Did you even manage to decrypt what I meant in the initial post? It would seem not as if you did, you would not be even be bringing Knight of Ratatosk into the argument. So I guess I'll give you another example. (For the sake of clarity, I guess?)

Tales of Destiny: We have seen the PSone version get released stateside. Did we see Tales of Destiny Full Voice version and Tales of Destiny Director's Cut (both on the PS2) released stateside?

Let me give you another one, probably the best example in the Tales franchise too. Tales of Phantasia. Out of the numerous remakes and ports Namco did to Phantasia, how many made it's way out of Japan?

I would've added Tales of Vesperia here, but I'm still hoping the PS3 version still gets to be released in America.

But since you brought in Knight of Ratatosk (or Dawn of the New World, if you prefer) in the fold, let me also bring these out then: Tales of Destiny 2 and Tales of the World: Radiant Mythology.

I do hope that the connections are now a bit clearer for you to see then.







PS: I am not the most hardcore Tales fan out there, but I am frustrated with Namco Bandai USA. Just sayin'.

you're just confusing the issue by adding other tales titles.
we're talking about symphonia on the argument.


1. i merely stated that you can get the SEQUEL of tales of symphonia on wii.
ToS: DotNW or Knight of Ratatoskr in jp.

2. you then stated that:

Sequel != Port
A remake can be a port but cannot be a sequel.
Just sayin'.

immediately after my statement. which would mean you're
trying to correct the previous statement. implying that DotNW is NOT
a sequel to Symphonia, which would be WRONG.

3. i then said that ToS:Knight of Ratatoskr/Dawn of the New World IS a sequel to
symphonia. with a story directly connected to and that happens after the original ToS.

......

all of which your previous connections to other tales titles are void,
since the argument was ONLY about the symphonia storyline, also
because both of the symphonia titles did make its way stateside, in the
same consoles they first appeared in. (GC and wii)

just sayin'
.

^ Ai-ya~

So are we talking about Symphonia now? Because all this time I'm replying with mkmcarlos' statement in mind.

1) it started with my simple statement that you can get
the sequel of *Symphonia* on the wii.

that statement itself is pretty clear and straightforward.
don't try to change or befuddle that that quote with other games.
i never mentioned the other tales titles, you were the one who
brought them up.

it was never destiny, not phantasia, not vesperia, ... it was *Symphonia*.
the sequel of *Symphonia* which is DotNW, or KoR(jp)

2) your next statement to which;

Sequel != Port
A remake can be a port but cannot be a sequel.
Just sayin'.

which to any normal reader, would be taken as a direct REPLY
to the sequel to symphonia statement. implying the previous
statement that ToS:DotNW is not a sequel, but merely a port.
(which is WRONG)

it wasn't directed at mkmcarlos, since he never mentioned a
anything about a sequel, and you already posted a previous reply
BEFORE i simply stated "you can get ToS' sequel on the wii".

3) my succeeding replies to which, is to prevent any erroneous info
from spreading; corrected your previous "Sequel != Port" statement.

4) after which you tried to make it confusing by throwing in other tales
games in the mix, when all the while it was ALWAYS ONLY about the *Symphonia*
sequel argument. and now shifting it to look like your replies
WASN'T about the *Symphonia* sequel at all. when the first simple
statement that started this was CLEARY about ToS.


just sayin'

^ If this is all bout Symphonia, then why don't you include the comment that triggered all of this? You know, this one here:

Khrysler Jerikho wrote:Tales of Symphonia may US version sa GC, pero hindi lumabas yung PS2 version nun. Just sayin'.

If you do actually backread a bit, that comment came out after Seraph11 and mkmcarlos wondered about the possibilities of having Tales of the Abyss 3DS being localized. Then came your reply about Dawn of Ratatosk.

After which, came this one here:

Khrysler Jerikho wrote:Sequel != Port

A remake can be a port but cannot be a sequel.

Just sayin'.

Clearly you have interpreted it quite differently than what I intended it to be, since you reacted on it on basis of your reply involving Ratatosk. If I'm going to omit the few posts that went ahead (which technically is the discussion about localization) and just start from the time that you mentioned Ratatosk then you would indeed be interpreting it as something related to Ratatosk being a sequel or not (which in fact is an actual sequel).

You know why I brought up other Tales titles in the mix? It was to further enhance my point in the localization discussion. Which I THOUGHT was still the subject matter at the time. But alas, it seems that we have deviated from that discussion to a way one, I think.

Oh, and I'm supposed to be the befuddled one at this point, right? Can you tell me what this "!=" symbol means then? I'd even doubt myself if I'm confused as heck. But maybe you can help me shed some light on that then.


Oh, BTW. Just sayin'.

you said it yourself.
both of them were talking about localization in the
aforementioned posts , NOT about a sequel. NOT about a remake.
my first statement didn't include any mention of localization.
only simply stating that the sequel of ToS is on the wii.

you replied with a "sequel != port" statement.
which would to mean to normal readers you were replying ABOUT the ToS Sequel reply.
and NOT about the post above, since they were about localization.
only to prevent the wrong interpretation for readers, i stated that
KR is a proper sequel.

if you were just trying to "further enhance your point in the localization" discussion,
then why do you have to react to a the simple that KR is a sequel statement?


....oh BTW, "not equal" is just basic.
just sayin'

.